Did Concorde have reheat?
Did Concorde have reheat? According to John Britton the Concorde was the only aircraft that was ever certificated with reheat that boost the thrust up to accelerate it transonic to Mach 1.
Is the Concorde faster than a fighter jet?
So, to answer the question, yes, some fighter jets are faster than the Concorde. However, it is important to note that the Concorde was primarily designed for passenger travel, not for combat or aerial maneuvers.
Could Concorde ever fly again?
The challenges of manufacturing and certifying new parts, maintaining a licensed flight crew capable of flying it, and ongoing maintenance and preservation mean we are no closer to seeing Concorde flying again since its last flight in 2003.
Did Concorde have reverse thrust?
The Concorde supersonic airliner could use reverse thrust in the air to increase the rate of descent. Only the inboard engines were used, and the engines were placed in reverse idle only in subsonic flight and when the aircraft was below 30,000 ft (9,100 m) in altitude.
Why did Concorde fly at 60000 feet?
Flying at this altitude not only helped save on fuel but also helped the jet save significant amounts of time, as at 60,000 feet, there were almost no jets that air traffic control would route Concordes around. The only aircraft flying beside the supersonic transport were either military aircraft or other Concordes.
Why was Concorde so quick?
Concorde used the most powerful pure jet engines flying commercially. The Aircraft's four engines took advantage of what is known as 'reheat' technology, adding fuel to the final stage of the engine, which produced the extra power required for take-off and the transition to supersonic flight.
Did Concorde have afterburners?
Afterburning was added to Concorde for take-off to cope with weight increases that came after the initial design. It was also used to accelerate through the high-drag transonic speed range, not because the extra thrust was required, but because it was available and improved the operating economics.
Could Concorde crash have been avoided?
Despite the crew being trained and certified, no plan existed for the simultaneous failure of two engines on the runway, as it was considered highly unlikely. Aborting the takeoff would have led to a high-speed runway excursion and collapse of the landing gear, which also would have caused the aircraft to crash.
How much did a Concorde ticket cost?
Such speed didn't come cheap, though: A transatlantic flight required the high-maintenance aircraft to gulp jet fuel at the rate of one ton per seat, and the average round-trip price was $12,000.
How safe was the Concorde?
Aircraft safety are often tracked with fatal accidents per flight. This is a valid metric because most plane accidents, esp. fatal ones, occur on take off phase or landing phase, one of each per flight. On that metric the Concorde was the safest plane for many years with no fatal accidents from about 1976 to 2000.
Was the Concorde loud inside?
The Concorde was famously loud: a take-off at Washington airport in 1977 measured 119.4 decibels. By comparison, a clap of thunder hits 120 decibels while the pain threshold for the human ear is around 110.
What will replace the Concorde?
Boom Supersonic, the US plane manufacturer, plans to have the answer with its new Overture jet, which is set to transport customers at twice the speed of today's fastest commercial aircraft, and is regarded as the new Concorde.
Did Concorde create a sonic boom?
The Concorde carried out supersonic flights until 2003, when it was retired. Also, because the plane flew faster than the speed of sound, it created a sonic boom, an explosive noise caused by shock waves that were a nuisance to people on the ground.
How many Concordes are left?
Concorde is sadly no longer flying, but it is still possible to visit some of the remaining 18 airframes, there are others not open to the public but you can still see them.
Could Concorde go Mach 3?
Constructed out of aluminium, it was the first airliner to have analogue fly-by-wire flight controls. The airliner could maintain a supercruise up to Mach 2.04 (2,170 km/h; 1,350 mph) at an altitude of 60,000 ft (18.3 km).